Skip to content
ReportThe 2026 State of TPRMDownload
For technology firms

Your product is only as trustworthy as your sub-processors. Coverbase keeps that list under control.

Every SaaS tool and sub-processor you add is something your own customers will audit. Coverbase manages vendor and sub-processor risk so security reviews stop being a fire drill.
Book a demo
Technology firms | SaaS tool
Technology firms | SaaS tool

A new tool connects to production

Read-only access
App settings
Your policy
Agent work
01Inspect settings
02Compare to policy
03Capture the finding
Finding with a source

Security confirms before the tool goes live.

01 · Overview

Why technology firms choose Coverbase

  1. 01

    Sub-processor management

    Maintain an accurate, current view of every sub-processor and the data each one handles.
  2. 02

    Built for SOC 2 and customer audits

    Keep the vendor evidence your auditors and enterprise customers ask for ready year-round.
  3. 03

    Vendor sprawl under control

    SaaS adoption is decentralized and fast. Coverbase flags new tools for assessment before they become shadow risk.
  4. 04

    Security reviews without the scramble

    Answer customer security questionnaires from a maintained source of truth instead of starting over each time.
  5. 05

    Diligence at startup speed

    Onboard vendors faster with automated evidence collection.
02 · How Coverbase helps

Vendor risk that moves at your speed

You ship fast and your customers hold you to a high security bar. Coverbase keeps the vendor side of that bar without slowing you down.

  1. Live sub-processor inventory

    A current map of who processes what, and a source for your trust page and DPAs.
  2. Automated assessments

    SOC 2s and security docs collected and reviewed without manual chasing.
  3. Shadow IT surfaced

    Catch tools the business adopts before they reach production unreviewed.
  4. Audit evidence on demand

    Hand auditors and customers a complete vendor record on request.
03 · Platform features

One platform for third-party risk and security

Speed with control

Automate procurement from intake to assessment to contract, with guardrails that keep your policies in force.

Explain with confidence

AI shows its reasoning for each recommendation, so you can explain your ratings, approvals, and exceptions.

Automate with assurance

Launch new workflows and adapt controls as your program and its regulations change.

04 · Security

How we protect your data

These are the practices behind the supplier records and evidence you keep in Coverbase. Read our security and privacy program.

To request our SOC 2 report or report a vulnerability, email security@coverbase.ai.

  1. Independent review

    A SOC 2 Type II audit against the AICPA Trust Services Criteria for security, availability, and confidentiality.
  2. Testing and remediation

    External penetration tests every year, plus vulnerability scans and static and dynamic application security tests, with findings tracked through remediation.
  3. Identity and production access

    SSO and SAML with Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google, and other identity providers. Multi-factor authentication is required for production access.
  4. Data protection

    Data encrypted at rest with AES-256 and in transit with TLS 1.2 or higher.
  5. Internal accountability

    Access logging, quarterly least-privilege reviews, and required employee security and privacy training.
05 · Questions

Security reviews for the vendor stack

What we manage and what stays with your team.

Can we use our own security controls?

Yes. We read supplier evidence against your security controls, including the requirements you apply to SSO and data access.

Does it replace our public sub-processor list?

No. We maintain the internal supplier and fourth-party review. Your team publishes and updates any customer-facing sub-processor list or notice.

Can it help with SOC 2 vendor evidence?

Yes. We organize submitted SOC 2 reports, the controls they address, and unresolved findings. Your auditor still issues its own opinion.

Ready for agentic third-party risk and security?